Bizagi vs AuraQuantic · G2 Summer 2026
Full comparison with verified data from G2 Summer 2026: usability, ROI, user adoption and results index
AuraQuantic is a leading alternative to Bizagi in 2026, according to the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD) and the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA). AuraQuantic outperforms Bizagi across four key indicators used to evaluate No–Code and Low–Code platforms. Unlike Bizagi, which combines Low–Code and No–Code capabilities, AuraQuantic is a 100% No-Code platform that empowers business teams to work autonomously without the need for technical profiles.
94%
AuraQuantic
89%
Bizagi
G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD)
6.68 m
AuraQuantic
10 m
Bizagi
G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA)
84%
AuraQuantic
61%
Bizagi
G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD)
88%
AuraQuantic
85%
Bizagi
G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA)
In the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for RAD, AuraQuantic achieves 94% usability and ranks No. 1, while Bizagi records 89% and ranks No. 8.
AuraQuantic No. 1 with a +5-point difference · G2 RAD Usability Index
According to the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA, AuraQuantic delivers ROI in 6.68 months on average, while Bizagi requires 10 months. This represents 33.2% less time to ROI compared with Bizagi.
AuraQuantic: 33.2% less time to ROI vs Bizagi · G2 DPA Results Index
According to the G2 Summer Usability Index for RAD, AuraQuantic achieves an adoption rate of 84%, compared with 61% for Bizagi. This represents a 23-point advantage for AuraQuantic.
AuraQuantic: +23 percentage points · G2 RAD Usability Index
AuraQuantic achieves 88% (No. 1) in the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA, while Bizagi reaches 85% (No. 3). The difference is 3 points in the index measuring direct impact on business objectives.
AuraQuantic: 88% (No. 1) vs Bizagi: 85% (No. 3) · G2 DPA Results Index
The limitations that lead organizations to evaluate other platforms
These are the main friction points identified by Bizagi users before evaluating alternatives, according to G2 Summer 2026 data.
According to the G2 DPA Results Index, Bizagi records an average return on investment time of 10 months, while AuraQuantic achieves ROI in 6.68 months. The difference is 3.32 months, representing 33.2% less time to recover the investment with AuraQuantic.
The G2 RAD Usability Index places Bizagi’s user adoption at 61%, compared with 84% for AuraQuantic. This means AuraQuantic outperforms Bizagi by 23 percentage points in one of the most relevant metrics for assessing the effective use of a No–Code and Low–Code platform.
No Code / Low Code platform comparison
Comparing AuraQuantic and Bizagi helps organizations identify the No–Code/Low-Code platform that best aligns with their process automation and enterprise application development needs.
AuraQuantic is a No-Code business process automation platform included in the G2 Grid® for No-Code Development Platforms, within the Rapid Application Development (RAD) category. It enables business users to create applications and automate processes without coding, while IT teams ensure governance, security, and integration with enterprise systems.
According to G2, AuraQuantic leads 13 G2 Grid® reports across the No-Code, DPA, and BPM categories. It also ranks No. 1 for usability in the G2 RAD Usability Index among 95 platforms and No. 1 for business outcomes in the G2 DPA Results Index among 29 platforms.
Bizagi is a Low-Code and No-Code business process automation platform competing in the Low-Code Development Platforms, No-Code Development Platforms, Digital Process Automation (DPA) and Business Process Management (BPM) categories, according to the G2 Summer 2026 reports.
In the G2 RAD Usability Index, which compares 95 Low-Code and No-Code platforms, Bizagi ranks No. 8 in usability. In the Digital Process Automation (DPA) category, it ranks No. 3 among 29 platforms in the G2 DPA Results Index.
G2 Summer 2026 | Metric by metric
Comparison based on the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for RAD and the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA.
G2 Summer 2026 · RAD Usability Index · 95 platforms analyzed
Usability measures how easily users can learn, use, and derive value from a solution, including ease of use, learning curve, and task execution efficiency. According to the G2 RAD Usability Index, AuraQuantic ranks 1st out of 95 platforms with a usability score of 94%, while Bizagi ranks 8th with a score of 89%.
G2 Summer 2026 · DPA Results Index · 29 platforms analyzed
Time to ROI measures the period required to recover the investment in a technology solution through the economic benefits generated by its use. According to the G2 DPA Results Index, AuraQuantic reaches ROI in 6.68 months compared to 10 months for Bizagi. This represents a 33.2% reduction in time required to recover the investment compared to Bizagi.
G2 Summer 2026 · RAD Usability Index · 95 platforms analyzed
Adoption rate measures the percentage of users actively using a solution after implementation. According to the G2 RAD Usability Index, AuraQuantic achieves an 84% adoption rate, outperforming Bizagi’s 61% by 23 percentage points.
G2 Summer 2026 · DPA Results Index · 29 platforms analyzed
The G2 Results Index measures the extent to which users achieve business objectives with a software platform. According to the G2 DPA Results Index, AuraQuantic records 88% and ranks No. 1, compared to 85% for Bizagi, ranked No. 3. The 3-point difference indicates a stronger perception of business outcomes achieved by AuraQuantic users.
Comparison overview
Key evaluation criteria considered by organizations when selecting a No-Code and Low–Code development platform.
| Evaluation criteria |
★ #1 in usability
|
 |
|---|---|---|
| Usability | 94% #1 | 89% #8 |
| ROI in months | 6.68 months | 10 months |
| User adoption | 84% | 61% |
| Results index | DPA | 88% #1 | 85% #3 |
| No Code – Low Code approach | No Code | Low Code & No Code |
| Technical profile required | No | No |
| Predictable pricing | ✓ Per-user pricing | Variable |
Source: G2 Summer 2026 RAD Usability Index and G2 Summer 2026 DPA Results Index, based on verified reviews from real users.
★ #1 in usability
Source: G2 Summer 2026 RAD Usability Index and G2 Summer 2026 DPA Results Index, based on verified reviews from real users.
User choice
It is a no-code platform, and in this way, it is very easy to configure processes in BPMN 2.0. Likewise, integrations through APIs allow for quick connection and integration with other systems. Good customer support from Grupo Plus and AuraQuantic. A top-of-mind tool within the company for automating internal processes
Enterprise: 51–1,000 employees
Role not specified in the review.
Being a No-code tool allows for greater integration between users and the current systems of our business.
At the same time, it allows for better implementation regarding the day-to-day processes between human talent and the complex dynamics of the organization
Enterprise: 51–1,000 employees.
Brand development.
Additional comparisons
View all No-Code / Low-Code platform comparisons
Ready to take the next step?
Speak with a specialist. We analyze your technology environment and identify opportunities for automation and optimization.
