Kissflow vs AuraQuantic · G2 Summer 2026
Full comparison with verified data from G2 Summer 2026: usability, ROI, user adoption and results index.
AuraQuantic is a leading alternative to Kissflow in 2026, according to the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD) and the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA). AuraQuantic outperforms Kissflow across four key indicators used to evaluate No-Code and Low-Code platforms. Unlike Kissflow, which combines both Low-Code and No-Code capabilities, AuraQuantic is a 100% No-Code platform designed to enable business teams to work autonomously without dependence on technical resources.
94%
AuraQuantic
82%
Kissflow
G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD)
6.68 m
AuraQuantic
13.06 m
Kissflow
G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA)
84%
AuraQuantic
68%
Kissflow
G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD)
88%
AuraQuantic
80%
Kissflow
G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA)
According to the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for RAD, AuraQuantic is the easiest-to-use platform among 95 evaluated solutions, with a usability score of 94% (No. 1), compared to 82% for Kissflow (No. 51). This 12-point difference places it at the top of the ranking.
AuraQuantic No. 1 with a +12-point difference · G2 RAD Usability Index
According to the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA, AuraQuantic reaches ROI in 6.68 months, compared to 13.06 months for Kissflow. Organizations using AuraQuantic recover their investment 48.85% faster.
AuraQuantic: 48.85% less time to ROI compared to Kissflow · G2 DPA Results Index
In the G2 Summer Usability Index for RAD, AuraQuantic records a user adoption rate of 84%, compared to 68% for Kissflow, a 16-percentage-point advantage in favor of AuraQuantic.
AuraQuantic: +16 percentage points · G2 RAD Usability Index
AuraQuantic ranks first with 88%, while Kissflow ranks No. 10 with 80%, according to the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA. This 8-point difference positions AuraQuantic as the platform with the strongest proven business impact.
AuraQuantic: 88% (No. 1) vs. Kissflow: 80% (No. 10) · G2 DPA Results Index
The limitations that lead organizations to evaluate other platforms
According to G2 Summer 2026 data, these are some of the key challenges and limitations prompting Kissflow users to explore alternative platforms.
With an average time to return on investment of 13.06 months, Kissflow takes 95.5% longer than AuraQuantic to deliver ROI, according to the G2 DPA Results Index. AuraQuantic reaches ROI in 6.68 months, almost half the time.
According to the G2 RAD Usability Index, AuraQuantic ranks 1st out of 95 platforms with a usability score of 94%, while Kissflow ranks 51st with a score of 82%.
No Code / Low Code platform comparison
Comparing AuraQuantic and Kissflow helps organizations identify the No-Code/Low-Code platform that best aligns with their process automation and enterprise application development needs.
AuraQuantic is a No-Code business process automation platform included in the G2 Grid® for No-Code Development Platforms, within the Rapid Application Development (RAD) category. It enables business users to create applications and automate processes without coding, while IT teams ensure governance, security, and integration with enterprise systems.
According to G2, AuraQuantic leads 13 G2 Grid® reports across the No-Code, DPA, and BPM categories. It also ranks No. 1 for usability in the G2 RAD Usability Index among 95 platforms and No. 1 for business outcomes in the G2 DPA Results Index among 29 platforms.
Kissflow is a Low-Code and No-Code business process automation platform, recognized in the G2 Grid® for No-Code Development Platforms, Low-Code Development Platforms, Digital Process Automation (DPA), and Business Process Management (BPM), according to G2 Summer 2026.
In the G2 RAD Usability Index, which evaluates No-Code and Low-Code platforms within the Rapid Development Applications (RAD) market, Kissflow ranks No. 51 out of 95 platforms. In the G2 DPA Results Index, which measures business outcomes, it is positioned No. 10 out of 29 platforms.
G2 Summer 2026 | Metric by metric
Comparison based on the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for RAD and the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA.
G2 Summer 2026 · RAD Usability Index · 95 platforms analyzed
Usability measures how easily users can learn, use, and derive value from a solution, including ease of use, learning curve, and task execution efficiency. According to the G2 RAD Usability Index, AuraQuantic ranks 1st out of 95 platforms with a usability score of 94%, while Kissflow ranks 51st with 82%.
G2 Summer 2026 · DPA Results Index · 29 platforms analyzed
Time to ROI measures the period required to recover the investment in a technology solution through the economic benefits generated by its use. According to the G2 DPA Results Index, AuraQuantic delivers ROI in 6.68 months, compared to 13.06 months for Kissflow. This represents a 48.85% reduction in the time required to recover the investment compared to Kissflow.
G2 Summer 2026 · RAD Usability Index · 95 platforms analyzed
The adoption rate measures the percentage of users who actively use a solution after implementation. According to the G2 RAD Usability Index, AuraQuantic achieves an adoption rate of 84%, compared to 68% for Kissflow, representing a 16-percentage-point difference in active usage.
G2 Summer 2026 · DPA Results Index · 29 platforms analyzed
The G2 Results Index measures the extent to which users achieve business objectives with a software platform. In the G2 DPA Results Index, AuraQuantic records 88% and ranks No. 1, while Kissflow records 80% and ranks No. 10. This represents an 8-percentage-point difference in business outcomes.
Comparison overview
Key evaluation criteria considered by organizations when selecting a No-Code and Low–Code development platform.
| Evaluation criteria |
★ #1 in usability
|
 |
|---|---|---|
| Usability | 94% #1 | 82% #51 |
| ROI in months | 6.68 months | 13.06 months |
| User adoption | 84% | 68% |
| Results index | DPA | 88% #1 | 80% #10 |
| No Code – Low Code approach | No Code | Low Code and No Code |
| Technical profile required | No | No |
| Predictable pricing | ✓ Price per user | Variable |
Source: G2 Summer 2026 RAD Usability Index and G2 Summer 2026 DPA Results Index, based on verified reviews from real users.
★ #1 in usability
Source: G2 Summer 2026 RAD Usability Index and G2 Summer 2026 DPA Results Index, based on verified reviews from real users.
User choice
It is noticeable that they have a good research team, because they have been including new features and technologies in the platform throughout all these years we have been clients. The additional service of keeping us up to date is appreciated.
Company size: 51–1,000 employees.
Solutions Architect.
It is easy to use and learn to configure. The support provided by the manufacturer is thorough and very accurate. They are constantly innovating and releasing improvements with the users in mind. It can be integrated with the company's core systems. A tool that is more than just a Workflow, but rather encompasses an ecosystem to develop processes in an agile and efficient manner.
Company size: 51–1,000 employees.
Process Manager.
Additional comparisons
View all No-Code / Low-Code platform comparisons
Ready to take the next step?
Speak with a specialist. We analyze your technology environment and identify opportunities for automation and optimization.
