Creatio vs AuraQuantic · G2 Summer 2026
Full comparison with verified data from G2 Summer 2026: usability, ROI, user adoption and results index.
AuraQuantic is a leading alternative to Creatio in 2026, according to the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD) and the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA). According to these G2 indexes, AuraQuantic outperforms Creatio across four key indicators used to evaluate No-Code and Low-Code platforms. In addition, AuraQuantic ranks first in usability within the Rapid Application Development (RAD) Software category, which includes both No-Code and Low-Code platforms.
94%
AuraQuantic
85%
Creatio
G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD)
6.68 m
AuraQuantic
11.31 m
Creatio
G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA)
84%
AuraQuantic
80%
Creatio
G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD)
88%
AuraQuantic
79%
Creatio
G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA)
According to the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for RAD, AuraQuantic is the most user-friendly platform among 95 evaluated solutions, with a usability score of 94% (No. 1), compared with 85% for Creatio (No. 27). The nine-point gap places AuraQuantic firmly at the top of the usability rankings.
AuraQuantic ranks No. 1 with a 9-point advantage · G2 RAD Usability Index
According to the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA, AuraQuantic reaches ROI in 6.68 months on average, while Creatio requires 11.31 months. This represents 40.94% less time to recover the investment, a significant difference for organizations seeking short-term results.
AuraQuantic: 40.94% shorter time to ROI · G2 DPA Results Index
In the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for RAD, AuraQuantic records an 84% user adoption rate, compared with 80% for Creatio. Higher adoption indicates that more users actively use the platform, resulting in greater utilization of its functionalities.
AuraQuantic: +4 percentage points · G2 RAD Usability Index
AuraQuantic achieves 88% in the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA (No. 1 among 29 platforms), compared with 79% for Creatio (No. 11). The 9-point difference positions AuraQuantic as the solution with the highest proven impact on business outcomes.
AuraQuantic: 88% (No. 1) vs Creatio: 79% (No. 11) · G2 DPA Results Index
The limitations that lead organizations to evaluate other platforms
According to G2 Summer 2026 data, these are some of the key challenges and limitations prompting Creatio users to explore alternative platforms.
With an average return on investment of 11.31 months, Creatio takes 40.94% longer than AuraQuantic to deliver ROI, according to the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for Digital Process Automation (DPA). AuraQuantic reaches ROI in 6.68 months, meaning it recovers the investment in almost half the time.
In the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for Rapid Application Development (RAD), Creatio records an 85% usability score and ranks No. 27 among 95 evaluated platforms. AuraQuantic leads the ranking with a 94% score in the same index (No. 1). The 9-point difference translates into greater ease of use, a shorter learning curve, and increased autonomy for teams in application development and automation.
No Code / Low Code platform comparison
Comparing AuraQuantic and Creatio helps organizations identify the No-Code/Low-Code platform that best aligns with their process automation and enterprise application development needs.
AuraQuantic is a No-Code business process automation platform included in the G2 Grid® for No-Code Development Platforms, within the Rapid Application Development (RAD) category. It enables business users to create applications and automate processes without coding, while IT teams ensure governance, security, and integration with enterprise systems.
According to G2, AuraQuantic leads 13 G2 Grid® reports across the No-Code, DPA, and BPM categories. It also ranks No. 1 for usability in the G2 RAD Usability Index among 95 platforms and No. 1 for business outcomes in the G2 DPA Results Index among 29 platforms.
Creatio is a No-Code business process automation platform, ranked in the G2 Grid® for No-Code Development Platforms and in the G2 Grid® for Digital Process Automation (DPA), according to G2 Summer 2026.
In the G2 RAD Usability Index, which evaluates No-Code and Low-Code platforms within the Rapid Development Applications (RAD) market, Creatio ranks 27th out of 95 platforms. In the G2 DPA Results Index, it is positioned 11th out of 29 platforms.
G2 Summer 2026 | Metric by metric
Comparison based on the G2 Summer 2026 Usability Index for RAD and the G2 Summer 2026 Results Index for DPA.
G2 Summer 2026 · RAD Usability Index · 95 platforms analyzed
Usability measures how easily users can learn, use, and derive value from a solution, including ease of use, learning curve, and task execution efficiency. According to the G2 RAD Usability Index, AuraQuantic ranks 1st out of 95 platforms with a usability score of 94%, while Creatio ranks 27th with a score of 85%.
G2 Summer 2026 · DPA Results Index · 29 platforms analyzed
Time to ROI measures the period required to recover the investment in a technology solution through the economic benefits generated by its use. According to the G2 DPA Results Index, AuraQuantic reaches ROI in 6.68 months compared to 11.31 months for Creatio. This represents a 40.94% reduction in the time needed to recover the investment compared to Creatio.
G2 Summer 2026 · RAD Usability Index · 95 platforms analyzed
The adoption rate measures the percentage of users who actively use a solution after implementation. According to the G2 RAD Usability Index, AuraQuantic achieves an 84% adoption rate, compared to 80% for Creatio, with a 4-percentage-point advantage in active usage.
G2 Summer 2026 · DPA Results Index · 29 platforms analyzed
The G2 Results Index measures the extent to which users achieve business goals with a software platform. According to the G2 DPA Results Index, AuraQuantic records 88% and ranks No. 1, compared to 79% for Creatio, ranked No. 11. The difference indicates a stronger perception of business outcomes achieved by AuraQuantic users.
Comparison overview
Key evaluation criteria considered by organizations when selecting a No-Code and Low–Code development platform.
| Evaluation criteria |
★ #1 in usability
|
 |
|---|---|---|
| Usability | 94% #1 | 85% #27 |
| ROI in months | 6.68 months | 11.31 months |
| User adoption | 84% | 80% |
| Results index | DPA | 88% #1 | 79% #11 |
| No Code – Low Code approach | No Code | No Code |
| Technical profile required | No | No |
| Predictable pricing | ✓ Per-user pricing | Variable |
Source: G2 Summer 2026 RAD Usability Index and G2 Summer 2026 DPA Results Index, based on verified reviews from real users.
★ #1 in usability
Source: G2 Summer 2026 RAD Usability Index and G2 Summer 2026 DPA Results Index, based on verified reviews from real users.
User choice
In the midst of processes that were obsolete, our organization needed an easy-to-use tool where, due to the number of processes and their frequency, AuraQuantic, with its NO CODE technology, facilitated the improvement and modernization of the processes, expanding the number of functions and the scope of customer support we are offering.
Company size: 51–1,000 employees.
Administrative assistant.
Aura has been key to the digital transformation of SISA. The flexibility and speed to create business applications with the "No Code" platform AuraQuantic has been a key factor that has allowed us to integrate and automate almost all of the company's processes.
Company size: 51–1,000 employees.
Regional Manager of Digital Transformation and Technology.
Additional comparisons
View all No-Code / Low-Code platform comparisons
Ready to take the next step?
Speak with a specialist. We analyze your technology environment and identify opportunities for automation and optimization.
